How Spotify Started

In the Beginning: A Response to a Piracy Problem

In the year 2006, Daniel Ek, the former CTO of Stardoll, and Martin Lorentzon, the co-founder of Tradedoubler, launched a small start-up in Stockholm, Sweden. This start-up was none other than Spotify Technology S.A., one of the world's largest music streaming service providers today.

The name Spotify was conceived in a rather unconventional way. It was initially misheard from a name shouted by Lorentzon. Later, they formed a portmanteau of "spot" and "identify" to make the catchy title we know today.

‍

The Motive: Better Than Piracy

Behind the inception of Spotify was a critical problem that was plaguing the music industry at that time - piracy. Prior to the advent of streaming services, many music enthusiasts were guilty of using controversial file-sharing sites like Napster, LimeWire, and The Pirate Bay to download music. This cost the music industry millions each year because, well, the users weren't paying for the songs.

Daniel Ek, in a 2010 interview with The Telegraph, expressed, "I realised that you can never legislate away from piracy. The only way to solve the problem was to create a service that was better than piracy and at the same time compensates the music industry." Daniel's hunch was that this service would be worth "tens of billions" one day. And, as we know now, his hunch wasn't far off.

‍

The Early Days: Free Service with Ads and a Paid Subscription

When Spotify was launched in 2006, it offered music fans a free service with advertising, in hopes they would upgrade to a £10 a month ad-free subscription. It had a vast collection of digital copyright-restricted audio content, including more than 100 million songs and five million podcasts, from record labels and media companies.

However, the path to its current success wasn't without hiccups. Public registration for the free service tier in the United Kingdom, opened in February 2010, had to be halted in September of the same year due to the surge in registrations following the release of the mobile service.

‍

Spotify in the United States

Spotify made its way to the United States in July 2011, offering a six-month, ad-supported trial period, during which new users could listen to an unlimited amount of music for free. But by January 2012, the free trial periods began to expire and limited users to ten hours of streaming each month and five plays per song. Despite the restrictions, Spotify managed to retain its users by offering ad-free music streaming, even on mobile devices.

‍

Bumps on the Road: The Controversy with Artists' Royalties

Despite its success, Spotify's journey was not devoid of controversy. Artists, including the likes of Taylor Swift, publicly spoke out against Spotify for what they believed was insufficient compensation for their work. Swift referred to the platform as an "experiment," stating she wasn't willing to contribute her life's work to a venture that didn't fairly compensate the creators of the music. However, Spotify remained hopeful and welcomed her to change her mind, which eventually happened when she ended her three-year feud with Spotify and put all her music back on the platform.

‍

Spotify's Future Challenges and Endeavors

In recent years, Spotify has been focusing more on live events, following in the footsteps of Apple with its live gigs. The company announced that it would be hiring a team to work specifically on live

 events for urban and Latin music. However, tech companies like Apple, Amazon, and Google are continuing to develop their streaming services and have come out with speakers, home assistants, and tablets which allow people to use their streaming apps directly with the brands' own products. This is a space that Spotify has yet to explore fully.

It's worth noting that Spotify's founders, Ek and Lorentzon, have continually sought to improve conditions for their employees and have not hesitated to express their concerns to politicians. In April 2016, they wrote an open letter to Swedish politicians, demanding action in areas that they claimed hindered the company's ability to recruit top talent, including access to flexible housing, better education in the programming and development fields, and stock options. Their stance was clear: to continue competing in a global economy, new policies were needed, or else thousands of Spotify jobs would be moved from Sweden to the United States.

‍